Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:53:55 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r339110 - head/audio/bebocd Message-ID: <20140113135355.GB78116@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201401081210.s08CAKC3057068@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201401081210.s08CAKC3057068@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:10:20PM +0000, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > New Revision: 339110 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/339110 > > Log: > Deprecate: abandoned by upstream, last activity about 10 years ago. I know that SF.net-hosted ports are hard to deal WRT deprecation (mainly due to the fact that they never naturally expire and mirrors continue to deliver distfiles), but I nonetheless wonder, why lack of activity for a GTK*2* port means it needs to go away from Ports sooner rather than later? Shall it be, e.g., gtk12 port, I would understand, albeit reluctantly, but gtk20 is still quite popular, and many folks even prefer it over gtk3. :) > PR: 158647 > Reported by: rm Cannot review PR right now; if it contains an answer to my question, please pardon my ignorance. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140113135355.GB78116>