Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Dec 2006 09:56:52 +0000
From:      Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To:        Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        saw@online.de, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, alfred@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: Man pages .Dd
Message-ID:  <20061204095652.GG73470@submonkey.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061204072948.GH36269@wantadilla.lemis.com>
References:  <20061130.081845.232929750.imp@bsdimp.com> <45702985.2040301@erpicon.de> <20061204002231.GB36269@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20061203.231525.-1272477723.imp@bsdimp.com> <20061204072948.GH36269@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--rWhLK7VZz0iBluhq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:59:48PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Sunday,  3 December 2006 at 23:15:25 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <20061204002231.GB36269@wantadilla.lemis.com>
> >             "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >> On Friday,  1 December 2006 at 14:09:25 +0100, Sascha Wildner wrote:
> >>> M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >>>> content changes, but not typos or formatting, is when it should be
> >>>> bumpped.  Also on MFC, the date used is the one in -current, not the
> >>>> date that you MFC.  This makes it hard to automate.
> >>>
> >>> Where exactly is the benefit in bumping/having dates on manpages at a=
ll?
> >>>
> >>> I mean, does anyone actually notice that the date changed (by
> >>> remembering the date of the previous version) and think, "oh great,
> >>> there's been a content change, let's check that out"?
> >>
> >> Good point.  Clearly it's worthwhile knowing what version of the man
> >> page you have, if only to know whether it's up to date.  But the
> >> $FreeBSD$ tag would give more information there.
> >
> > <mode=3Dbde>
> > $FreeBSD$ or $Date$ would pessimize the display of the date by
> > uglifying the presentation to the user.
> > </mode>
>=20
> Only if you were to display it in its entirety.  Macros exist to
> convert them into correct dates.

There's no problem here to solve; move along, people :)

Ceri
--=20
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere

--rWhLK7VZz0iBluhq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFc/DkocfcwTS3JF8RAn17AJ9Ht7/kafhfxId/vy7SzWTTEdpl3QCfSyRb
2qtjcvRbm9bAqfkGH0jY+2Q=
=vMmd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rWhLK7VZz0iBluhq--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061204095652.GG73470>