Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:08:22 -0700 From: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes Message-ID: <20110319200822.GD1019@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim_0Cfh16bA%2BJAOu50LCT6RCuExYObv_PmbhY7=@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimuxnfb6ys%2Bx9GFRrQvNOdje6TTP-L7jgDkWBqZ@mail.gmail.com> <1300501941.51379.5.camel@xenon> <AANLkTim_0Cfh16bA%2BJAOu50LCT6RCuExYObv_PmbhY7=@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat 19 Mar 2011 at 12:18:42 PDT Olivier Smedts wrote: >2011/3/19 Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com>: >> On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote: >> >>> Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category. >>> Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general >>> key to the new categories is as follows: >> >> [...] >> >>> www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries >> >> Just a quick thought to the 'discuss' part: Is this (above) really the >> best name possible? >> >> I mean "world wide web-webapps" sounds kind of redundant. > >OK, this is a bikeshed discussion, but I agree here. www-apps would be >more appropriate. Well, on behalf of the blue bikeshed, I'd like to point out that www-apps isn't specific enough to exclude all the things that are going into the other www- categories. How about www-serverapps?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110319200822.GD1019>