Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 14:36:01 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Munish Chopra <chopra@runbox.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: XFS (was: ReiserFS (was: JFS (was: The FreeBSD core team needs your help)))a Message-ID: <20010708143601.A80862@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20010708022223.D271@arcadia.megadeb.org>; from chopra@runbox.com on Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 02:22:23AM %2B0200 References: <20010707132458.D75626@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010707144259.Q550-100000@consult-meyers.com> <20010708090243.U75626@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010708022223.D271@arcadia.megadeb.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, 8 July 2001 at 2:22:23 +0200, Munish Chopra wrote: > > I'm still more impressed by XFS (on paper), but I've never run it on > Linux myself. From those that have though, I hear it's very good, and > the SGI folks seem to be putting a lot of work into key areas. Some of > the kiddie diseases are wearing off apparently, and it's actually > maturing nicely. Agreed, it seems like quite a good design to me too. I have heard recently, however, that they needed to make a number of changes to the Linux kernel in order to get it to perform acceptably, and that Linux may not accept these changes. I don't know any details, however. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010708143601.A80862>