Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:23:52 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: build tools as separate distribution Message-ID: <87490.967663432@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> of "Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:01:26 PDT." <20000830100126.D45710@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, actually, I said "no" for 4.1. If you can figure out how to do this cleanly and in such a way that there's no tech support hit for it (making the always-necessary assumption that users are dumber than a bag of hammers), I'd certainly entertain the suggestion. - Jordan > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:30:39PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > What would the good people think of moving gcc, gas, ld etc., as well > > as include files and static libraries out of the bin dist and into a > > separate distribution, called e.g. prog or devel? There are a lot of > > You need to convince JKH (as release engineer). I was going to do this > for 4.2, but he said no. > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87490.967663432>