Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:53:49 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r254986 - head/sys/ufs/ufs Message-ID: <CAF-QHFVmW=jSKkJCbyLnJXoSwieDELrUyKHjwdQXM0Urpvbb%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACYV=-FfjZrOqfOitmvs78N=L38dzzaWsVhMbQHnVC0g1CP1VQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201308281006.r7SA6KSq010737@svn.freebsd.org> <CACYV=-GtV5vwsd5zWX6=i-z2yHND8rZT_dWXhdjnBhMb4jjTvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF-QHFU-cdd2b-7PHwFW8H2Unmtpp4iid3bZwmqfwKVk3cR=-g@mail.gmail.com> <CACYV=-FfjZrOqfOitmvs78N=L38dzzaWsVhMbQHnVC0g1CP1VQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 August 2013 12:44, Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org> wrote: > Do you realize that this is a driven by commit change, right? And > there's no technical motivatiion about this or experimental data that > confirms you've chossen the right value? > I see from the archives that you didn't get any feedback by anyone > working in the VM layer or by some UFS maintainer. > I don't even comment about discussing -CURRENT changes in stable@. You have a point that this was a judgment call, but note that the last change to dirhash tuning (maxmem) was also done by me. Since this is -CURRENT, I will leave this commit in unless it proves detrimental in the usual testing which goes on. If you still feel strongly about this, contact me in private and we'll investigate its effects in more detail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFVmW=jSKkJCbyLnJXoSwieDELrUyKHjwdQXM0Urpvbb%2Bg>