Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Mar 2001 00:05:32 +0000
From:      Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>
To:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
Cc:        kris@obsecurity.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_output.c
Message-ID:  <3AAEB5CC.640D6CAA@originative.co.uk>
References:  <3AAEA0B6.669CB86C@originative.co.uk> <20010313143849.A19262@mollari.cthul.hu> <3AAEA597.81830243@originative.co.uk> <20010313155059P.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > So to use the ports system you must upgrade your system every three
> > months? That's just ridiculous, nobody in the "real world" upgrades
> > their systems that often, including the project itself.
> 
> That's hardly the case.  To use the ports system as a user who doesn't
> want to upgrade things, you need to simply LEAVE IT ALONE.  Don't run
> cvsup, don't use CTM, no-touchie ports tree!

but what about the sysadmin who has to support a real world environment
where a product needs to be upgraded to fix a bug, a typical, real world
application like say the web server, or database.

Hypthetically, I've got this perfectly stable OS that's not caused me a
problem in 12 months of use but because I need to upgrade Apache I also
have to upgrade the base OS, taking the machine offline probably since
it's running at a high security level, in all likelyhood making the
journey to the data centre where it's co-located to do this work. All
this headache just to upgrade an application?

No sysadmin in their right mind would go for an OS that requires the box
to be upgraded in order to support the applications that they want to
run. You choose your OS to give you a stable bedrock to do your work on,
you wouldn't give it a second look if some of it's key features require
regular system upgrades.

Not so hypothetically, I had this 4.0 web server that needed an amanda
client installed on it but that required the latest ports version. It
seemed to me to be a flaw in the way we are doing things that that
wasn't a no brainer of a sysadmin job but instead required some jumping
through hoops. I really didn't expect such vehement defense of the
current environment for pointing out what seems like a significant flaw.



Paul.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AAEB5CC.640D6CAA>