Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:50:01 -0800 From: Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Importing djb's public domain daemontools? Message-ID: <CAETOPp0GoKghErXZQgTtRPnVF1ctGFx7dc8KgW-9hp1YCXyyUw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86ipkasnyt.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <CAETOPp2Wcww1_fPonru0c6XoX%2BAV_HWoGZKiEMvmY50a5%2ByxRQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F14E291.5090803@FreeBSD.org> <CAETOPp1z0TJecz8kjDvf7trEOS5eogrcqEtDveUYzN=J-SvDNQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F1502CD.90409@FreeBSD.org> <E4B18E7A-74A1-4388-AD79-05DD3E667DAE@bsdimp.com> <86ipkasnyt.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/1/17 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> > Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > > I'm not convinced it is a non-starter. I'd fully support Jos if he > > wanted to commit the code and had done the leg work to do it. I > > wouldn't support just importing the daemontools and leaving it at > > that. If that's the plan, then leaving it in ports is the best bet. > > If we ever want to move in that direction, we should look at launchd, > not daemontools. > That's fine. I merely proposed daemontools because I have lots of experience with it, it is in the public domain and it seems less intrusive than launchd - it would just be a handful extra binaries people like me could use if they wanted to= . Jos > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Jos Backus jos at catnook.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAETOPp0GoKghErXZQgTtRPnVF1ctGFx7dc8KgW-9hp1YCXyyUw>