Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:48:24 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook book.sgml Message-ID: <4DCEEA98.4090300@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201105141806.p4EI6upK087278@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201105141806.p4EI6upK087278@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Isn't the issue whether or not 70 characters will wrap in any of the places that COMMENT is used? On 05/14/2011 11:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > marcus 2011-05-14 18:06:56 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook book.sgml > Log: > Correct a discrepancy between the Porter's Handbook and portlint with regard > to COMMENT. Portlint recommends a COMMENT no longer than 70 characters where > as the Porter's Handbook recommends 60. Given that most people have built > COMMENT based on the portlint's recommendation, update the handbook to say > COMMENT should be no longer than 70 characters. > > PR: 156832 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156832 > Discussed with: portmgr > > Revision Changes Path > 1.1105 +1 -1 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml.diff?&r1=1.1104&r2=1.1105&f=h > -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DCEEA98.4090300>