Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:08:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de Cc: eischen@vigrid.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, kip@lyris.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: seg fault in mutex_queue_enq Message-ID: <199907151708.NAA03267@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Jordan should have to say something about this. AFAIR, bumps are > > allowed but only by one between releases. We will have to provide > > libc_r.so.3 in /usr/lib/compat/compat3x, though (we'll have to do this > > anyway by the time 4.x is released). > > I'd prefer not to bump it... John Birrell and I are already not > entirely in agreement that the change required a version bump at > all. It didn't change any interfaces. I don't care one way or the other. I could leave out the wrapped poll() very easily and avoid the issue all together. This would provide -stable with everything -current has, except of course poll(). I'd prefer to add poll, though... If you don't bump the version in -stable, then you could end up with two versions of libc_r that are not different (assuming -current doesn't make any subsequent changes that warrant a version bump). Just tell me what to do, and I'll do it :-) Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907151708.NAA03267>