Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:30:17 +0700 (ICT) From: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <200509190730.j8J7UHoV096429@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <20050919065017.GC17888@dataloss.nl> (message from Peter van Dijk on Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:50:17 %2B0200) References: <20050919.004531.92589257.mshindo@mshindo.net> <432D9249.9090202@mac.com> <432DA0AC.8010802@thedarkside.nl> <432DA922.5030303@errno.com> <200509190606.j8J66JbO095192@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20050919063322.GA17888@dataloss.nl> <200509190637.j8J6bxu6095963@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20050919065017.GC17888@dataloss.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > But that ARP thing happens also with interfaces that are not part of > > the bridge! Even if the interfaces are ifconfiged NOARP. > > This is not what I observed... which of the 3 bridging implementations > (bridge, if_bridge, ng_bridge) have you seen this behaviour with? Hummm, I am not sure, the one enabled with the option BRIDGE in the kernel (4.10 RELENG), so I guess the first on. Of course not netgraph. And of course i cannot find anymore syslog message :( The situtation was: - fxp1: one interface with no IP, NOARP connected to my inside lan, bridge to fxp0 - fxp0: one interface with no IP, NOARP connected to my outside lan, bridge to fxp1 - xl0: one interface with IP connected to my inside lan. At random times, fxp1 would respond to ARP requests about the IP of xl0. Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509190730.j8J7UHoV096429>