Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 14:52:50 -0800 From: Studded <Studded@dal.net> To: Nicole Harrington <nicole@mediacity.com> Cc: The experts <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: BIND (WAS: Re: 2.2.6-BETA OOP-ACK-BLEH sendmail 8.8.8 won't compile) Message-ID: <350715C2.E240EDA4@dal.net> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980311113316.15994G-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> <350704E9.E2ACBD66@dal.net> <Chameleon.889656161.nmh@geekgirl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nicole Harrington wrote: > Hmm > I know that we have been using 8.1.1 for awhile now for primary and secondary > NS for a very large number of domains and it does very well. It does have a > small learning curve though. Me too. :) But the performance of the named binary while running an actual nameserver is an entirely different issue from the resolver libraries, other libraries and headers that are built into every part of the system, whether you're running a nameserver or not. I realize it's a rather arcane thing if you're not familiar with how unix binaries are built, but trust me, it's apples and oranges. Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** *** Proud operator, designer and maintainer of the world's largest *** Internet Relay Chat server. 5,328 clients and still growing. *** Try spider.dal.net on ports 6662-4 (Powered by FreeBSD) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?350715C2.E240EDA4>