Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:13:47 +0800 From: genght@cn.ibm.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Why is FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE box more slow than slackware3.5 box? Message-ID: <48256714.00124BCC.00@cn.ibm.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear all, I have two boxes that have the same hardware.One is FreeBSD2.2.8-RELEASE and the other is Slackware3.5. They are using the same Intel 10/100 NIC and attaching to the same 10/100 Bay 450T switch.But when I ftp/telnet to my FreeBSD box(either from win95 client or from linux client),it responded after a very very long time (I think it is dead,but not.)But the linux box work perfectly. Why? Does FreeBSD2.2.8-RELEASE have some faults when handing the 100M ethernet? I so love FreeBSD, I am not willing hear that FreeBSD is worse than slackware. Some one can help me?Any advice is welcome. Thanks in advance. Regards, Haotao Geng E_mail:genght@cn.ibm.com Tel: 86 755 6639841x186 Fax: 86 755 6639840 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48256714.00124BCC.00>