Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:57:56 +0200 From: Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dovecot, maildir, UFS 2 performance Message-ID: <48DA6384.3080400@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <gbcvk8$3fb$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <48D95A19.8030700@shopzeus.com> <gbcvk8$3fb$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You can treat UFS as ext2/3 with dir_index enabled by default (not
> exactly but that's what dirhash translates to in practice).
> UFS by default creates 2k fragments ("sub-blocks"), so in practice any
> tuning in this direction won't do much.
> More drives=better in this case. Don't forget to tune dirhash_maxmem.
I think this is what I really wanted to know. Thank you!
Laszlo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48DA6384.3080400>