Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:20:37 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Omachonu Ogali <oogali@intranova.net> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Parent Logging Patch for sh(1) Message-ID: <10770.948198037@axl.noc.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:02:26 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.10.10001180657470.99197-100000@hydrant.intranova.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:02:26 EST, Omachonu Ogali wrote: > My main focus was on BIND, I haven't seen someone yet who has smashed > the stack and changed argv[0], I must admit, I thought anything linked against libutil would be able to call setproctitle(3) (yes, I know that named doesn't). I also thought setproctitle(3) changes what you see via /proc. I could be wrong on either or both counts, but don't really feel like checking. ;-) Regardless, you should still take my advice and contact Robert Watson if you're really interested in contributing to FreeBSD security. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10770.948198037>