Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      05 Mar 2003 09:41:44 -0500
From:      Christopher Fowler <cfowler@outpostsentinel.com>
To:        David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IP over IEEE1394?
Message-ID:  <1046875304.5667.31.camel@cfowler.outpostsentinel.com>
In-Reply-To: <43A441A1-4F17-11D7-A732-0003937E39E0@mac.com>
References:  <43A441A1-4F17-11D7-A732-0003937E39E0@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You can run IP via PPP.  PPPD is used all the time for VPN.  I've got 2
networks that are combined via PPPD over a tunnel because they are both
on private networks and have only 1 public IP.

However, The overhead could get you. I'm not sure you want to go down
the writer of creating another interface.  Maybe you could use the SLIP
interface and capture that IP stuff and send across.

  

On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:32, David Leimbach wrote:
> True... I guess I didn't state my case clearly enough that I think IP  
> over firewire
> is in itself a good thing for clusters.
> 
> ppp connections with it are fine too but not very useful for my line of  
> work
> which is parallel computing middleware :)
> 
> Dave
> On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 08:30 AM, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> 
> > The beauty of ppp is that you have support in the kernel to do it.
> > Else, you are stuck to writing some type of interface driver for the
> > kernel.  In the short term, this may not be a workable solution.
> >
> > On a side note,
> >
> > I read an article on /. about using firewire + MinDV for backup.  I
> > guess I can get some use out of my camera after all.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 09:21, David Leimbach wrote:
> >> Yeah... point to point connections are interesting and powerful but IP
> >> would
> >> be better if we could get it.
> >>
> >> I wish I knew more about how to implement it. :)
> >>
> >> Dave
> >> On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 08:23 AM, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> >>
> >>> This may not be a workable solution, but if you can get 2 programs to
> >>> send data across the firewire to one another, you could use pppd
> >>> through
> >>> that tunnel.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:25, David Leimbach wrote:
> >>>> Interesting... I didn't even know we had Ethernet over firewire :).
> >>>>
> >>>> Mac OS X and Windows XP both have IP over firewire either working or
> >>>> in the works and somewhat usable.  The only one I can claim any
> >>>> experience
> >>>> with is Mac OS X.  It's somewhat flaky though and you get unreliable
> >>>> spikes
> >>>> in some basic performance tests I have done with it.
> >>>>
> >>>> It would be a really interesting value added feature for FreeBSD 5.x
> >>>> and could potentially open FBSD up even more to the "cluster" market
> >>>> which is somewhere its not as proliferated as linux.
> >>>>
> >>>> With the advent of firewire2  on the horizon it may be even more
> >>>> impressive.
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe there is even an Oracle product for linux which can  
> >>>> cluster
> >>>> databases
> >>>> over firewire now.  [I don't know if its IP though]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Dave
> >>>> On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 01:43 AM, Rossam Souza Silva wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi, there is some plan to port NetBSD's implementation of IP over
> >>>>> Firewire? I know, we have "Ethernet over Firewire", but like the
> >>>>> Linux
> >>>>> one, isn't a standard...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just curious.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> -------
> >>>>>     (_ )   "Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly. It
> >>>>> just
> >>>>> happens
> >>>>>  \\\'',) ^  to be very selective about who it decides to make  
> >>>>> friends
> >>>>> with."
> >>>>>    \/  \(
> >>>>>    .\._/_)  Rossam Souza Silva (rss@cin.ufpe.br)
> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> ------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> >>>>> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> >>>> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> >
> >



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1046875304.5667.31.camel>