Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: paul@originative.co.uk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: EGCS optimizations Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904061347320.55808-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <199904062001.NAA10310@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > It's no big deal, really. I think the EGCS bandwagon is going to continue > to move forward and PGCS runs on top of it, so moving to EGCS puts FreeBSD > in a better position in the long term. Well what would be the chances of getting the pgcc patches committed? It seems like this wouldn't have a negative impact on other non x86 hardware, but might be a win for us stuck with Pentiums or PIIs. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9904061347320.55808-100000>