Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:44:12 -0700
From:      Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Colin Percival <cperciva@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_prot.c src/sys/sys systm.h
Message-ID:  <6.1.0.6.1.20040716143932.040665d0@popserver.sfu.ca>
In-Reply-To: <200407161542.40585.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200407161557.i6GFvGWg003796@repoman.freebsd.org> <200407161542.40585.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:42 16/07/2004, John Baldwin wrote:
>On Friday 16 July 2004 11:57 am, Colin Percival wrote:
>>   Log:
>>   Add a SUSER_RUID flag to suser_cred.  This flag indicates that we want to
>>   check if the *real* user is the superuser (vs. the normal behaviour,
>> which checks the effective user).
>
>Could we rename PRISON_ROOT to SUSER_PRISONOK or some such to be consistent?

I'd be happy to do this; should I simply add the new name, or should I
make the substitution across the entire tree?

Colin Percival




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.0.6.1.20040716143932.040665d0>