Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:53:05 -0600
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
To:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   maintainer for metamail?  (was Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/metamail Makefile ports/mail/metamail/files patch-ae patch-af)
Message-ID:  <20040218215305.GA47727@madman.celabo.org>
In-Reply-To: <200402182147.i1ILlJ6L021224@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200402182147.i1ILlJ6L021224@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:47:18PM -0800, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> nectar      2004/02/18 13:47:18 PST
> 
>   FreeBSD ports repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     mail/metamail        Makefile 
>     mail/metamail/files  patch-ae patch-af 
>   Log:
>   Correct two format string vulnerabilities and two buffer overflows in
>   metamail (CVE names CAN-2004-0104 and CAN-2004-0104).
>   
>   Submitted by:   Ulf Härnhammar <Ulf.Harnhammar.9485@student.uu.se>
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.21      +1 -0      ports/mail/metamail/Makefile
>   1.2       +20 -2     ports/mail/metamail/files/patch-ae
>   1.2       +58 -2     ports/mail/metamail/files/patch-af

You know, I'm almost certain these are not the only issues in this
port.

Please, will someone step forward to maintain this port and look for and
correct outstanding security issues therein?  I can pass on some
information I have.

Otherwise (if a maintainer does *not* step forward), I will mark this
port FORBIDDEN.  The only reason I don't do it now is because a few
other ports depend upon this one :-(

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040218215305.GA47727>