Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 16:25:04 +0100 From: Jase Thew <jase@FreeBSD.org> To: Kenta Suzumoto <kentas@hush.com>, Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail and UPDATING20131010 Message-ID: <525969D0.7010901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20131012001349.9111660191@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <20131011170340.47C726018E@smtp.hushmail.com> <5258939C.2010909@a1poweruser.com> <20131012001349.9111660191@smtp.hushmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/10/2013 01:13, Kenta Suzumoto wrote: > > > On 10/11/2013 at 8:11 PM, "Fbsd8" <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote: >> The jail rc.script environment in 10.0 has been patched to convert all >> the jail rc.conf parameters to the new jail(8) format and then exec >> jail(8). This is in preparation for depreciating the jail.conf jail >> parameters. >> >> ezjail uses the rc.conf jail parameters and needs to be updated to use >> the native jail(8) parameters. Until that gets done ezjail only works >> with 9.2 and older versions of FreeBSD. The qjail utility uses the >> native jail(8) parameters right now. Give it a try. > > Thanks but no thanks. I'm not interested in a ripoff project that doesn't > give credit to the original work it stole from. I'll wait for ezjail to be updated > or hrs@ to submit his patch to -CURRENT. > +1 -- Jase Thew jase@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Ports Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?525969D0.7010901>