Date: 19 Feb 2002 13:34:02 +0100 From: micheloo@xs4all.nl (Michel Oosterhof) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kerberos 5 Message-ID: <a4tgnq$aq5$1@xs4.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020218152309.B6619@ninja1.internal>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sean@chittenden.ORG (Sean Chittenden) writes: >> what is the difference between MIT and KTH versions ? >MIT is more feature complete in an enterprise space. Heimdal is >decent, but doesn't have any of the nifty features that MIT does >(password classes and expiration). All the same, Heimdal has readline >support and that's a heavy point in Heimdal's favor. >> what is security/krb5 ? is it legal for Russia ? is it different from >> MIT Kerberos included with base distribution ? >MIT isn't included with the base. I use security/krb5 and it works >great. Heimdal doesn't work with CVS or PostgreSQL to my knowledge. Could this be because the version of Heimdal in -STABLE (or -CURRENT) is relatively old, and has some API's different than MIT krb5? I ran into this once trying to compile an apache module for kerberos. There is also a heimdal port which is more up to date, that might work better, if you prefer heimdal. (security/heimdal, i think) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a4tgnq$aq5$1>