Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:41:26 -0400 From: P Kern <pak@utcc.utoronto.ca> To: bms@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: pak@utcc.utoronto.ca Subject: Re: kern/90155: [netinet] [patch] use sysctl(8) to control hardware checksumming. Message-ID: <06Sep28.144131edt.46191@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From FreeBSD.org!bms Thu Sep 28 12:38:51 2006 > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:36:54 -0400 > From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@FreeBSD.org> > To: pak@cns.utoronto.ca, bms@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: kern/90155: [netinet] [patch] use sysctl(8) to control hardware checksumming. > > Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] use sysctl(8) to control hardware checksumming. > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bms > State-Changed-When: Thu Sep 28 16:36:02 UTC 2006 > State-Changed-Why: > > Hi, there was an older PR for this in the 4.x train. We killed off bridge(4) > in the 7.x lifetime as if_bridge(4) should do the right thing by hardware > checksumming. Are you happy for us to kill this off? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90155 Yes, please feel free to kill it off. I'm looking forward to checking out if_bridge. Thanks for the note. pak.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?06Sep28.144131edt.46191>