Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:11:01 +0100 From: Simon Barner <barner@FreeBSD.org> To: Pavel Gorshkov <gorshkov.pavel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SHA1_Update() produces wrong results for large buffers Message-ID: <20060110011100.GA61821@zi025.glh.mhn.de> In-Reply-To: <20060109235953.GA2868@localhost> References: <20060109235953.GA2868@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pavel Gorshkov wrote: > Everything was tested on a RELENG_6/i386 box (CFLAGS =3D -O2). How exactly do you know, that the static version is wrong, and not vice-vera (e.g. caused by the -O2 optimization)? --=20 Best regards / Viele Gr=FC=DFe, barner@FreeBSD.= org Simon Barner barner@gmx.de --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDwwmkCkn+/eutqCoRAi+KAJ9Av4mrudRNmcKJVOVYxAgtNb0kawCgpKIE uRkvUNNAWyDCmTPxo+o4Czg= =jcL8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060110011100.GA61821>