Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:45:16 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> To: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is em endian-clean? Message-ID: <2a41acea0705220045p68b59df7iff7689ec2f7e19f4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170705212059q5895428dk6c4946d4bf47192d@mail.gmail.com> References: <b1fa29170705212059q5895428dk6c4946d4bf47192d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, Linux is tested on big endian, however FreeBSD testing is limited. I would expect the shared code to be ok but the core code is tested on little endian only. Do you have some notion of where the problem is? I'm pretty busy with another issue right at the moment. Jack On 5/21/07, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jack - > I believe I've fixed the sun4v breakage caused by the interrupt filter > changes but it appears that em still isn't working. Does Intel test at > all on big endian hardware? If not, what do you do to avoid breaking > e1000 on Linux? > > Thanks. > > -Kip >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a41acea0705220045p68b59df7iff7689ec2f7e19f4>