Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:25:43 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
To:        Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@gmail.com>, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>,  FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>
Subject:   Re: Runaway process in -CURRENT
Message-ID:  <CAGwOe2Z2ZjjNwwT1=9vJ820PNoZSxJeQMoAKpe8YUtorW1p7Dw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B71A339-6053-4446-97C2-0EE4572F87D5@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CAGwOe2aCU7HigZJdx2YJCrDZsWUtRVApFzzvPTx%2BLE-AP_B4qA@mail.gmail.com> <71697463-4E52-4B46-B60B-00BDD87D8A2C@FreeBSD.org> <CAGwOe2aODZ3skAEVn9kF3ruKFQtQjFfUk_sa2_hJp99YYgnKsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2bkkNye_B4OjG9e0p4Dnp3EbRyP0=vh6yhfHBQ_6r-7yQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2awSX9Svh9Y-3Ew_PMY1=srHLD01CKfqDzeuXNMA3KS5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2Y1wFZSr0zEsugzPDoTA2b6oznG=ggZwfSTWoi5h173WA@mail.gmail.com> <EF12ACA3-3E86-4DCA-AC0A-E7D5E6D27438@FreeBSD.org> <CAGwOe2ZBUDqSXzofkPESkv0q=cCqp%2BCGRMLXERUq7PYBA0znrg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2Z2YPvFP0vzsixfWRAz1XHqDupc1mxmFvjuyocAf%2Bk5Dw@mail.gmail.com> <8B71A339-6053-4446-97C2-0EE4572F87D5@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 25 ago. 2017 20:50, "Dimitry Andric" <dim@freebsd.org> escribi=C3=B3:

On 25 Aug 2017, at 17:10, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernando.apesteguia@gma=
il.com>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa
> <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote:
...
>>> As a quick workaround, the port can be modified to compile these files
>>> using a lower optimization level.  If -O1 is used for the longest case,
>>> e.g. schemas/sdai_wip210e3/compstructs.cc, the compile time drops down
>>> to ~30s.  I don't think it will matter very much for the speed or size
>>> of the output.
>>
>> I'll have a look at this.
>
> Is this problem going to be reported upstream?

This took some time, I reported it here:

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D34326


Thank you very much.

I'll test the port again once the fix from upstream is imported into
FreeBSD. In the meantime I'll submit an update with a workaround.

Cheers.



-Dimitry



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2Z2ZjjNwwT1=9vJ820PNoZSxJeQMoAKpe8YUtorW1p7Dw>