Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:24:16 -0800 From: "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: "Andriy Gapon" <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?) Message-ID: <7d6fde3d0901100724la51365cp83ed94d917654605@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4968BCC4.7090708@icyb.net.ua> References: <4968AE90.5010004@icyb.net.ua> <7d6fde3d0901100711p70e9a66ahadc3c2570fc6f94b@mail.gmail.com> <4968BB5D.8070909@icyb.net.ua> <7d6fde3d0901100716i552420ddja6a59a4938e70fc9@mail.gmail.com> <7d6fde3d0901100718s31ae9f38i5db870b7059bdfbe@mail.gmail.com> <4968BCC4.7090708@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> wrote: > on 10/01/2009 17:18 Garrett Cooper said the following: >> >> s/same functionality/same basic functionality/. >> Mind you, NFS is a networking filesystem. ZFS is a filestore >> filesystem, more rooted to the local machine I thought, like UFS. > > I am well aware of this. The difference between UFS and ZFS is that for > the former you have to maintain /etc/exports by hand and for the latter > /etc/zfs/exports is automatically managed via zfs tools. > > Andriy Gapon Maybe a zmountd or equivalent script should be written for zfs and the common code should be factored out for both cases? -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0901100724la51365cp83ed94d917654605>