Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 11:42:53 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C Message-ID: <200407071142.53897.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20040707160745.GA39557@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <E1Bhd1M-000KEo-Nz@smp500.sitetronics.com> <20040707152149.GG82302@elvis.mu.org> <20040707160745.GA39557@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_NgC7AcddpQFgb2e
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 2004-07-07 11:07 am, Steve Kargl wrote:
> It is Kirk's incessant rambling that ezm3 isn't portable to other OSes;
> therefore, csup should be in the base system that I find illogical.=20
You're either on crack or a liar. I said this, once:
cvsup is so absolutely necessary for system maintenance that it seems
like a logical addition.=20
and then never said anything more about putting csup in the base system.
The rest of my involvement in the thread was a discussion of the=20
shortcomings of ezm3 as I see them and why I thought that using a version=20
in a more popular language would be a good thing.
If you want to civilly debate my arguments, I'll be happy to discuss them=20
with you. If you insist putting words in my mouth, though, then I'm done=20
with you.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser
--Boundary-02=_NgC7AcddpQFgb2e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQBA7CgN5sRg+Y0CpvERAoSXAJ9j0SZf90/olq/4Yo292sxCSrH32wCgiXzW
/r5PK57vjlHgLzVpk7iPjys=
=hKAE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Boundary-02=_NgC7AcddpQFgb2e--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407071142.53897.kirk>