Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:01:34 -0500
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To:        David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org, Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com>
Subject:   Re: Make GNU Make behave like BSD Make?
Message-ID:  <20050713210134.GB75904@dan.emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050713204130.GA48891@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>
References:  <20050713145649.GA47667@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <42D53D89.20100@dial.pipex.com> <20050713182621.GA48396@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20050713190807.GA75904@dan.emsphone.com> <20050713204130.GA48891@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Jul 13), David Kelly said:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:08:07PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > I believe "-include .depend" will tell gmake to try to include the
> > file but not complain if it's not there.
> 
> Yes! That does work!
> 
> OTOH it breaks in BSD Make.  :-(

Automake's method of handling dependencies is interesting; it generates
a dependency file for each object file as part of the .c.o rule.  It
includes them all at the bottom of the Makefile and generates dummy
entries during the ./configure stage to placate gmake.  You could do
something similar with the one-big-depend style by including a dummy
.depend file in your tarball with a date in the past.  The first Make
run will include the dummy .depend and force a rebuild because it's out
of date.  Since the dependency file isn't needed the first time you
generate object files, that's okay.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050713210134.GB75904>