Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:20:51 -0400
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        Stec John <stecjohn2005@mail.ws>,  freebsd Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: ipfw2 - too many dynamic rules
Message-ID:  <43559F73.4010403@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <013701c5d44a$3c4943b0$df010a0a@csl.ws>
References:  <00ca01c5d428$ec7b6fa0$df010a0a@csl.ws> <435585C2.6040006@mac.com> <013701c5d44a$3c4943b0$df010a0a@csl.ws>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stec John wrote:
> Hi Chuck, are you suggesting to add these dns rules on top of the existing
> rules?

Yes.

> Can I use "allow" instead of "pass"?

Yes, they mean the same thing:


              allow   Allow packets that match rule.  The search terminates.
                      Aliases are pass, permit and accept.

-- 
-Chuck



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43559F73.4010403>