Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:51:14 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD Message-ID: <420AF652.7040308@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050209.082507.35867907.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200502061104.37960.reso3w83@verizon.net> <68a08ad2f9cff22dfa603b47311158cd@beforever.com> <20050209145329.GA27679@wirehub.nl> <20050209.082507.35867907.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20050209145329.GA27679@wirehub.nl> > Robert Joosten <rjmlist@xs4all.nl> writes: >:> Besides, it sounds like CVSUP will soon be replaced by something >:> much more efficient. >: >: http://subversion.tigris.org/ ? > > He said something more efficient. cvsup is extremely efficient in > using all the bandwidth available to it, in both directions. > subversion, while it has many other virtues, hasn't optimized the > transport layer to such a large extent... A good point. On the other hand, Subversion removes the need to perform network access to do common operations like diff and annotate. That's invaluable for people who use a laptop while commuting and are w/o network access for a time. -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420AF652.7040308>