Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:46:00 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Any chances to reduce number of gcc ports/packages which are installed as BINARY PACKAGES dependencies? Message-ID: <20140721214600.GG26699@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407212305390.6423@tuna.site> References: <466003436.20140717005829@serebryakov.spb.ru> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1407212305390.6423@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xs+9IvWevLaxKUtW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > Maybe, we should encourage ports, which is needed gcc, to use only one > > version? If many ports needs 4.8, maybe, we should bump "any" version = to > > 4.8 for gcc-less systems? And move all other versions to 4.8? >=20 > I would love to do that, in fact, I hope that at one point we can > eventually get rid of USE_GCC=3Dany. >=20 > What I can do for now, and have been planning to do for a few weeks, > is https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D192025 aka > "Update default version of GCC (USE_GCC=3Dyes, lang/gcc,...) to GCC 4.8". >=20 > > Or build binary packages WITHOUT java by default!? Does anybody uses g= cj > > FOR REAL when we have native openjdk7 and openjdk8?! >=20 > There is good news, and there is bad news. The bad news is that=20 > print/pdftk actually relies on the Java functionality in the GCC ports=20 > to build. The good news is that it seems to be the only such port. >=20 > Mathieu, is there a way you can help? I'd be happy to turn off Java > by default (but leave it in). >=20 > On top of these two, the really nice improvement is going to be when > we can support the creation of several packages out of one port -- at > that point we'd just break out a small gcc-runtime package. Won't it be possible to make gcj a slave port? That is said with no idea of gcc's internal way of building :) regards, Bapt --xs+9IvWevLaxKUtW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPNihgACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExttACgjWe+dcJCbr2k6zKIgushWQ70 p04AoLIulqRC9NWnt+AUMNnIyoUtj9Lz =4wIz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xs+9IvWevLaxKUtW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140721214600.GG26699>