Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 May 1998 19:56:50 +0200
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: elf vs. bsd.*.mk
Message-ID:  <19980530195650.41062@follo.net>
In-Reply-To: <199805301736.BAA24556@spinner.netplex.com.au>; from Peter Wemm on Sun, May 31, 1998 at 01:36:32AM %2B0800
References:  <199805301736.BAA24556@spinner.netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 31, 1998 at 01:36:32AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> So, I thought I'd see what general feelings were on the subject.  Do we 
> really want things like ${LIBDIR} defined for *all* makefiles, including 
> non bsd.prog.mk etc Makefiles.  Also, make.conf is also globally visible 
> as well.  I'm sure this can't be good for posix compliance etc.  Since 
> I've finished 95% of the work so far, should I press on and clean up the 
> loose ends, or should I put it in the 'too hard' basket for the time being 
> and try the simple way out :-).

In my very strong opinion, bsd.own.mk should not be included from
sys.mk

If you have time to do it, do it, otherwise it'll stay on my mental
todo-list (and will just keep being postponed until sometime in the
very far future...)

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980530195650.41062>