Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:59:41 -0400 (EDT) From: hamlet <hamlet@nexthop.net> To: JJB <Barbish3@adelphia.net> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: pf on 4.10 Message-ID: <20040707145133.C13552@rinzai.nexthop.net> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEINGFAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net> References: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEINGFAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
as far as i remember, that's correct. this is moderately fuzzy memory from the 'state of freebsd' presentation at usenix, but appears to match my rather sketchy notes. ~hamlet On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, JJB wrote: > Please clarify; > > It's my understanding that in 5.3 pf will be delivered as the 3rd > built in firewall solution. > It will have it's own boot time loadable module just like ipfilter. > No kernel recompile needed to enable it. > > Is this correct? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of hamlet > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 1:59 PM > To: JJB > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG > Subject: Re: pf on 4.10 > > > that's coming in 5.3-RELEASE > > ~hamlet > > On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, JJB wrote: > > > Is there an port of pf firewall that installs on 4.10? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040707145133.C13552>