Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:47:20 +0000 (GMT)
From:      "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing Lists <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.62.0604281445300.5263@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
In-Reply-To: <C0782487.3FFD9%Shane@007Marketing.com>
References:  <C0782487.3FFD9%Shane@007Marketing.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
SA> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:59:03 +0930
SA> From: Shane Ambler

SA> I haven't dug real deep for data but a casual look through the
SA> Intel's dual Xeon board specs shows they don't say where their
SA> network controllers are connected but some of their boards have an
SA> Intel ethernet controller as well as "one Marvell* Yukon* -EC
SA> 88E8050 PCI Express*"

Search for "CSA bus" or "communications streaming architecture" for
Intel's perspective.


Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.62.0604281445300.5263>