Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:13:47 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Cc: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dhclient sucks Message-ID: <42E83F5B.7000700@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <42E82F2E.9030505@errno.com> References: <42E583F9.3070703@rogers.com> <200507261853.07513.peter@wemm.org> <1242.172.16.0.199.1122429678.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <200507271215.14369.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42E6F5EA.7030801@samsco.org> <42E71F77.6010705@FreeBSD.org> <17127.41923.312257.159166@canoe.dclg.ca> <42E82F2E.9030505@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Leffler wrote: > David Gilbert wrote: > >> The ISC dhclient would probe multiple interfaces simultaneously. The >> new one waits for some amount o ftime on my hardwire ethernet (rarely >> used) before probing my wireless. The result is a longer startup. I misread the above. I saw brooks pointed out the "don't wait at startup" option and you responded that this was unacceptable. I don't see your proposing an alternative except to revert to the isc code which right now we're not looking to do. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42E83F5B.7000700>