Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:36:00 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: r256920 missing in stable/9 and releng/9.3 Message-ID: <201407101336.00965.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA@mail.gmail.com> References: <37229F0A-4BEA-4712-9AE1-5446A630AF9F@transactionware.com> <53BA8666.9040608@omnilan.de> <CALCpEUG0DSs3mMaUPTvfKV6S6voEOOHkYifZe406mpM7a8MZYA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, July 07, 2014 12:58:53 pm hiren panchasara wrote: > + freebsd-net@, >=20 > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer > <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > > Bez=C3=BCglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht vom 24.06.2014 04:49 (localtim= e): > >> Hi, > >> > >> I=E2=80=99m bringing 9.3-RC1 into our local Perforce depot and moving = our local=20 patches to 9.2 forward. > >> > >> I noticed that r256920 (changing sys/netinet/tcp_input.c) has not been= =20 MFC=E2=80=99d. It was listed as =E2=80=9CMFC after 3 days=E2=80=9D back in = October 2013. > >> > >> Is this patch missing for a reason? > > > > I'm wondering too if there's any good reason not to MFC? >=20 > I also don't see any obvious reason. >=20 > If nobody objects on -net@, I can do it. I think this looks fine to merge. =2D-=20 John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201407101336.00965.jhb>