Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:30:05 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: Jack F Vogel <jfv@freebsd.org>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, "net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Flow ID, LACP, and igb Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmom8TppCc1%2Bio53cCct17NV=7x374zfE7Zq1ShSZ72bufA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <521BBD21.4070304@freebsd.org> References: <D01A0CB2-B1E3-4F4B-97FA-4C821C0E3FD2@FreeBSD.org> <521BBD21.4070304@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... is there any reason we wouldn't want to have the TX and RX for a given flow mapped to the same core? -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmom8TppCc1%2Bio53cCct17NV=7x374zfE7Zq1ShSZ72bufA>