Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:03:49 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.c Message-ID: <20050819100349.GY659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050819094625.GD57615@cell.sick.ru> References: <200508181034.j7IAYUSS015059@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050818232116.GS659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050819092219.GB57615@cell.sick.ru> <20050819094038.GV659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050819094625.GD57615@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> J> This sysctl is definitely carp(4)-centric, this is underlined by its > J> name :-). I'm not sure why you don't want to put this is carp(4) > J> manpage. Is it to make easier the future imports of the carp(4) > J> subsystem from OpenBSD ? > > The people, looking for this sysctl, in most cases don't use CARP. > It'll be strange to search for the answer in manpage for facility, > that you don't use. Ok I understand, so I'd vote for the inet(4) manual page, what do you think about this ? Documentation people should have the correct answer, however. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050819100349.GY659>