Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:32:16 -0800 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org> Cc: Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org>, x11-list freebsd <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Mesa compiler specification Message-ID: <CAN6yY1u97SVyfGNOJZk87gN7irUEq96feJomaMq2rfBf7MYEUA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <va2h-a9cl-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAN6yY1vpY=UU9pWRbTiNsjg4-skHL65VRkRQtCTxxFxVQUh7vw@mail.gmail.com> <1548102802.155408.1640253448.5CE3BE92@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAN6yY1tCoEBBOpJn3yjjuxaQ=H0_YFXc0y5gqmH2i%2B7EOoJY4Q@mail.gmail.com> <va2h-a9cl-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks! A much better solution. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:18 PM Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org> wrote: > Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:33 PM Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 21:20, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> > I am happy to see mesa-18.3.2 has made it to ports. Thanks, Jan. > >> > > >> > I do have one question/request... Can the mesa ports be updated to > allow > >> > compilation with either llvm60 or llvm70? I have been compiling with > >> llvm70 > >> > fora few weeks with no problems. It both compiles and runs fine. It > was > >> the > >> > only remaining port on my system requiring llvm60 and I suspect that > I am > >> > not alone in this. > >> > >> You can do this by simply setting MESA_LLVM_VER=70 in make.conf. > >> > > > > Thanks but it is not really the proper way to solve the problem. This is > > something that should "just work" and not require figuring out what needs > > to be added to make.conf. At least a note in a pkg-message would help. > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=llvm=70 (already default) syntax would apply to mesa-dri > after v2 in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230789 > lands. > > Once devel/llvm80 appears it'd be time to prepare for LLVM_DEFAULT bump, > patching consumers and asking port maintainers for feedback until actual > release happens. Based on results consumers not ready would be temporarily > kicked out from LLVM_DEFAULT train, or maybe someone provides a better > idea. > llvm80 stabilization is partially dependent on how much help > clang800-import > effort receives. > > Note, LLVM_DEFAULT is defined in Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1u97SVyfGNOJZk87gN7irUEq96feJomaMq2rfBf7MYEUA>