Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:43:50 -0400
From:      "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>
To:        "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org>
Cc:        misc@openbsd.org, Harpalus a Como <harpalus.como@gmail.com>, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>, netbsd-users@netbsd.org, miros-discuss@mirbsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The future of NetBSD
Message-ID:  <f34ca13c0608310843p4e28b57eoec2f60737c034ddb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060831110112.J82634@hub.org>
References:  <20060830232723.GU10101@multics.mit.edu> <98f5a8830608301731s2b0663e3g94b0bd32f8a06a78@mail.gmail.com> <c6d37fe0608310259k12fe629eve59e59042fcfdb4c@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0608311312190.8977@odem.66h.42h.de> <950621ad0608310654h78ae0023g346abd108815ae72@mail.gmail.com> <20060831110112.J82634@hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Harpalus a Como wrote:
>
> > I'm just a lurker on the OpenBSD list, but I think Charles is right about
> > Linux. The code is better then people give it credit for, and considering
> > it's vast popularity and what all it's accomplished, the "bazaar" model has
> > worked wonders. I'm not advocating Linux, I'm just pointing out that
> > considering where Linux is, where it's headed, who all is backing it, I
> > really don't see it stagnating or dying anytime soon.
> >
> > If I'm correct, that's also what Charles thinks NetBSD needs among other
> > things, to look at their model for inspiration. I agree.
>
> Just a stupid comment, but ... Linux is one kernel, multiple distributions
> ... BSD is, what, 4 kernels now?  If we worked more together instead of as
> seperate camps, it might make things a bit easier, no?

Isn't there still fewer differences between *BSD operating systems
than between different GNU/Linux distributions and kernel releases? :)

> Put together a *BSD "core" ... representative from each camp and try and
> steer the *kernel* itself towards a more common BSD ...

I doubt that'll be productive -- NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD have all
different goals...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f34ca13c0608310843p4e28b57eoec2f60737c034ddb>