Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 13:23:37 -0500 From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: "freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org" <freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems booting 9.1-STABLE on Netra X1 Message-ID: <FFAEF446-E683-420B-882E-08ADDCB87B2A@distal.com> In-Reply-To: <20130302005318.GA22053@alchemy.franken.de> References: <CE371F2B-CF62-4695-A9F0-B56995BA3CC6@distal.com> <20130225101315.GA79064@alchemy.franken.de> <76C74932-5BB0-4194-86CE-F121F6D18D84@distal.com> <20130225214941.GD955@alchemy.franken.de> <3A37672E-B6F7-4D5E-8293-0ED3B203C358@distal.com> <20130226013400.GG955@alchemy.franken.de> <5F00D05B-37BB-4342-AE56-C707B5267C17@distal.com> <20130302005318.GA22053@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 1, 2013, at 19:53 , Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> =
wrote:
> Craig Butler confirmed my impression that generally there's no =
downside
> from registering a handler for the power fail interrupt on X1 (or V100
> for that matter). So I did what I initially thought would be the best
> option if the affected machine(s) indeed run stable despite this issue
> and added a loader tunable in r247600. By setting hw.psycho.powerfail =
to
> 0 you can now disable setting up the interrupt handler.
Thank you. I look forward to being able to throw out the if clause I =
put
into my tree and doing it in the "official" way. Will that be MFC'd to =
stable/9 ?
- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FFAEF446-E683-420B-882E-08ADDCB87B2A>