Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:23:42 GMT
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   PERFORCE change 111194 for review
Message-ID:  <200612061323.kB6DNgsn098612@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=111194

Change 111194 by rdivacky@rdivacky_witten on 2006/12/06 13:23:04

	Add an XXX comment about signal delivery in linux_exit_group.
	We currently ignore sending a signal if SIGNAL_EXIT_GROUP is set
	condition. We dont even implement this flag....

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c#44 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c#44 (text+ko) ====

@@ -1605,6 +1605,11 @@
 		EMUL_SHARED_RUNLOCK(&emul_shared_lock);
 		EMUL_UNLOCK(&emul_lock);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * XXX: we should send a signal to the parent if
+	 * SIGNAL_EXIT_GROUP is set. We ignore that (temporrarily?)
+	 * as it doesnt occur often.
+	 */
 	exit1(td, W_EXITCODE(args->error_code, 0));
 
 	return (0);



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612061323.kB6DNgsn098612>