Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:14:34 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 211423] [exp-run] mprotect(): const void * -> void *
Message-ID:  <bug-211423-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211423

            Bug ID: 211423
           Summary: [exp-run] mprotect(): const void * -> void *
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Ports Framework
          Assignee: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: ed@FreeBSD.org
                CC: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org

Created attachment 173070
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D173070&action=
=3Dedit
Patch for making mprotect() use 'void *'

Hi there,

Our mprotect() function deviates from the standard by using 'const void *'
instead of 'void *' as its first argument. I'm planning on changing this in
HEAD, but I'd like to see what it breaks.

Could one of you please do an exp-run to determine the impact? I guess it
doesn't matter if this run is done on 10.x, 11.x or HEAD.

Thanks,
Ed

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211423-13>