Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:52:10 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Nielsen <enkhyl@scient.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> Cc: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>, John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za>, bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/obj/elf, /usr/obj/aout, /usr/obj - breaks make all vs make buildworld, and other things. Time to make elf the default Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901131350130.316-100000@ender.sf.scient.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901121557090.84303-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, John Birrell wrote: > > > Since most people only care about i386 (and to a lesser extent alpha), > > I doubt that the cross-compilation issues are worth considering at this > > point. People are too ready to shoot down any new ideas. > > Anything to improve the state of cross compiling is a good thing. Anyone > who thinks otherwise is being a stick in the mud and should be ignored. I have to agree with Alfred here. With the work we're starting to do on the UltraSPARC port, better support for cross-compilation would be very beneficial. I don't see how it can really hurt anything, either. -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The eBusiness Systems Innovator <http://www.scient.com>; cnielsen@scient.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901131350130.316-100000>