Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:26:09 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r353936 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch Message-ID: <20191024082609.GA63459@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201910231657.x9NGvCMD039111@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201910231657.x9NGvCMD039111@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:57:12PM +0000, Dimitry Andric wrote: > New Revision: 353936 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/353936 > > Log: > Bump clang's default target CPU for the i386 architecture (aka "x86") to > i686, as per the discussion on the freebsd-arch mailing list. Earlier > in r352030, I had already bumped it to i586, to work around missing > atomic 64 bit functions for the i386 architecture. Why i686, not i586? i486 lacking 64-bit atomics is a sound and valid reason, but I don't understand why i586 wasn't chosen, and quick review of that -arch thread did not help. Could you shed some more light here? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20191024082609.GA63459>