Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:03:57 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches Message-ID: <20120616160356.GN98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo83-Pr5Qqa6oUFKmfbLuuDOCiDQoiLVvjPfvJ1fT8ou0h9g@mail.gmail.com> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--7fwXp2o0gOrkU5lS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:49:22PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer gr= ain name. >=20 > That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create > sub-packages. As I understand it, you'll be building and installing > each port into a staging area, and then creating a number of different > packages from what's in the staging area. >=20 > So for a port foo, you might create: >=20 > foo-0.99 --- the foo application and libfoo.so.0 shared > library > foo-docs-0.99 --- documentation > foo-examples-0.99 --- example configurations etc. > foo-devlibs-0.99 --- *.h headers, libfoo.a static lib, profiling > libs and other things useful for developers. >=20 > and so forth. So these are distinct packages all from one port with its > own UNIQUENAME and hence all using that port's OPTIONS settings, and all > built in one block. >=20 > Having UNIQUENAMESUFFIX for docs, examples, devlibs etc. would imply all > of those are entirely separate ports, like the way bacula and > bacula-docs are handled at the moment. >=20 > I can see there will need to be some sort of SUBPACKAGESUFFIXES variable > and associated gubbins in the ports makefiles, to do that, > plus something like tagging the entries in pkg-plist to identify which > sub-package they should belong to. >=20 > Trying to mix that with UNIQUENAMESUFFIXes would get pretty complicated. > Not to mention the question of foo-devel -- is that the devel > sub-package of the foo port, or a separate foo-devel port?[*] Yes you are right regards, Bapt --7fwXp2o0gOrkU5lS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/crmwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew0XwCfYNBZVYvAjscG3Xy2CN4Xlg1B VtkAn1Y0CoKOaciRXmDWmKr2jLXyfGXE =Ijl6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7fwXp2o0gOrkU5lS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120616160356.GN98264>