Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:48:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, alc@cs.rice.edu, tlambert@primenet.com, bakul@torrentnet.com, julian@whistle.com, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: high-efficiency SMP locks - submission for review Message-ID: <199906290048.RAA07089@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <31902.930591499@critter.freebsd.dk> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Jun 28, 99 07:38:19 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >The 386, I doubt has it. There have been a couple of suggestions for ending > >the support for the 386 as it will simplify some ugly code for emulating > >kernel-mode write faults etc, but it's never happened. Apparently the > >386 is common in some areas still. > > People in the embedded business would kill us. No lie. 486GX macrocells are cheap, but 386 macrocells are cheaper. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906290048.RAA07089>