Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:09:15 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: files/patch-* pathname separators Message-ID: <4086808B.9020308@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <xzphdvdv4qw.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200404181922.i3IJMkTf044706@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040419032304.GA61048@regency.nsu.ru> <20040419103101.GB26102@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040419110810.GA24385@regency.nsu.ru> <20040420200903.GA6174@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040421094050.GA5052@FreeBSD.org> <40864E82.90904@portaone.com> <xzpu0zdv7hb.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040421130214.GC5052@FreeBSD.org> <xzphdvdv4qw.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >>I also tend to like the ::-convention, as it is the same separator as >>used in various programming languages (Ruby, Perl, C++, etc) and thus >>already is in the "separator" slot in my mind. However, in private mail >>David referred to a previous discussion that he said had resulted in a >>decision against it. Is there anybody out there that agree with David >>in this? > > > All previous discussions of which I am aware ended with ports people > saying "this is how we do things" and David objecting strenuously. If Exactly my impression. -Maxim > David thinks otherwise, he should provide relevant references to > archived threads. Or he could just save us all (and himself) a lot of > grief, stop worrying, and learn to love the bomb. > > DES
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4086808B.9020308>