Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Aragon Gouveia <aragon@phat.za.net>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: misc/41674: iostat column formatting overlaps
Message-ID:  <200208151820.g7FIK5Mq080988@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR misc/41674; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Aragon Gouveia <aragon@phat.za.net>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: misc/41674: iostat column formatting overlaps
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:18:15 +0200

 Perfect. :)
 
 
 | By Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
 |                                          [ 2002-08-15 20:02 +0200 ]
 > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Aragon Gouveia wrote:
 > 
 > > | By Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
 > > |                                          [ 2002-08-15 10:37 +0200 ]
 > > > This makes it a nightmare to read on 80-column terminals.  The number of
 > > > devices shown by default would have to be reduced from 3 to only 2 to
 > > > reduce the line length to less than 80 columns again.
 > > >
 > > > Printing more precision might confuse parsers that expect plain integers,
 > > > especially if they know that the integers are formatted in 3 characters,
 > > > as they probably have to do to parse the run together digits.
 > >
 > > Ok understandable. I think the column spacing should atleast be increased a
 > > notch to accomodate "100" without overlapping with a value next to it.
 > >
 > > I didn't intend to include the precision change in my diff - that kinda
 > > slipped in by accident because I use it. I don't think it's necessary
 > > either, but would be a nice option to enable on the command line.
 > >
 > > Will %4.0f still be too big for 80 column terms?
 > 
 > It takes 80 exactly, which is 1 too many after line wrap.  I suggest using
 > almost the same method as in vmstat: " %2.0f" always leaves a space and
 > usually has the same effect as "%3.0f".  (vmstat uses "%2.0f " except for
 > the last field it uses "%2.0f".)
 > 
 > %%%
 > Index: iostat.c
 > ===================================================================
 > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/iostat/iostat.c,v
 > retrieving revision 1.23
 > diff -u -2 -r1.23 iostat.c
 > --- iostat.c	26 Sep 2001 19:35:03 -0000	1.23
 > +++ iostat.c	15 Aug 2002 17:55:10 -0000
 > @@ -727,5 +728,5 @@
 >  		time += cur.cp_time[state];
 >  	for (state = 0; state < CPUSTATES; ++state)
 > -		printf("%3.0f",
 > +		printf(" %2.0f",
 >  		       rint(100. * cur.cp_time[state] / (time ? time : 1)));
 >  }
 > %%%
 > 
 > Bruce
 > 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208151820.g7FIK5Mq080988>