Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:03:40 +0000 From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com> To: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bind in FreeBSD, security advisories Message-ID: <CE1D31B0.E393%gwiley@verisign.com> In-Reply-To: <1375189153.2267.3238635.3FA46177@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The package would have to be reworked to remove the name server - not an impossible task and you could make a case for it from an ideological perspective, but is it worth the work? On 7/30/13 8:59 AM, "Mark Felder" <feld@freebsd.org> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 7:47, Daniel Kalchev wrote: >>=20 >> We could in theory remove the BIND's authoritative name server >> executable... if that is attracting the SAs. >>=20 > >It's the same executable, that's the problem :-) >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CE1D31B0.E393%gwiley>